Making A Game : Trinity's Rubric on game grading
CreativityWell organized and very elaborated on game choice. Joyful to read, play, and learn about. 15pts. Well organized and elaborated on game choice. Joyful to read, play, and learn about. Needs slight work on organization. 10pts. Organized and elaborated on game choice. Difficult to read, play, and learn about. Needs work on organization and creativity. 5pts Not so much thought put into interest of game choice. No organization, little to no creativity. 1pt. |
Cooperative workThe group worked great together with all members contributing and
completing their assigned task.15pts. The group generally worked well together with all members contributing their share of work. 10pts. The group worked somewhat ok together. Some work on task while other half is off task. 5pts. The group had no chemistry together. Work barely done, sloppy, and to many different expressions. 1pt. |
PlanningThe group knew exactly what was needed to accomplish the lesson ahead for their game choice. Everyone had an assigned task. 15pts.
The group knew exactly what was needed to accomplish the lesson ahead but slight disagreements here and there. Everyone had an assigned task. 10pts. The group had little direction in knowing what was needed to express game choice and how to split up the work. 5pts. The group had no planning. No one was assigned a specific task to complete for completion. 1pts. |
PresentationThe group was organized, crisp, clear, and on point with displaying their project/game to the class and was able to answer questions clearly. 15pts. The group was organized, clear, and on point with displaying their project/game to the class and was able to answer questions clearly. 10pts. The group had difficulties with their organization and display for the class. Didn't quite answer questions to their full potential. 5pts. The group displayed a poor presentation on their game. Lacked enough information for students to have a clear idea of the game. Didn't answer question completely. 1pt. |
Knowledge about gameThe group was able to explain the game and
the creator's/editor's purpose for creating the game along with the history of the game. 15pts. The group was able to tell the class about the game and understand the history of the game. 10pts. The group had minimum knowledge of the game they chose. Knew the creator/editor but didn't know what their purpose was. 5pts. The group had no intelligence on the game. No history or reason for the creation of the game. Only supported the creator's/editor's names. 1pt. |